Palladium Times Square

1515 Broadway,
New York, NY 10036

Unfavorite 32 people favorited this theater

Showing 251 - 275 of 573 comments

sdoerr
sdoerr on August 2, 2004 at 7:20 pm

Confirmed, I called…oddly enough there is still someone there “When is the last day the theater will be open”.. replied with “Were already closed”. Such a shame.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on August 2, 2004 at 6:53 pm

I think that really stinks Bill. They couldn’t put an exclusive film in there for a week. I think I ma going to e mail Loews and everybody should do the same.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 2, 2004 at 5:20 pm

So much for my final trip to the Astor Plaza on closing day, August 5th. They closed yesterday. To all the Astor Plaza naysayers, I know it ain’t the Roxy and never came close, but I had so many good times there and I’m going to miss it.

StephenJohansen
StephenJohansen on July 31, 2004 at 8:32 pm

A fine farewell and parting to the Astor Plaza. It is a shame.
But, the greatest movie theater of all times anywhere in the world was the Radio City Music Hall and it is still standing. It shows a premiere movie every now and then, but at least it is still here, and now the New York Liberty is currently taking over for the Rockettes. I think all movie palace fans should plan a big party and rent out the Music Hall! And the contour curtain still remains.

br91975
br91975 on July 31, 2004 at 7:16 am

My Astor Plaza memories are limited to having seen only two films there – ‘Runaway Bride’ and ‘Signs’. Both were disappointments; I hoofed it out after 20 minutes of ‘Bride’, to the gasps of what had to have been an auditorium full of tourists who, by dint of their bellylaughing at some of the lamest ‘humor’ ever committed to film AND some of their murmurings of, ‘Oh! He’s walking out!’, I’m convinced to this day got SERIOUSLY lost on their way to Branson and a Wayne Newton ‘extravaganza’, and ‘Signs’ was a bit too heavy-handed for my tastes. The theatre itself, though, was a singular experience – that curved screen, those seemingly endless rows of seats… wow! I feared from the time the double-booking of the Astor Plaza and 42nd Street E-Walk begain in the spring of 2002 that the Astor’s days were numbered and, sure enough, those fears have now been realized. You (and the Ziegfeld) are the closest things to a movie palace this 28-year-old film buff has ever had the privilege of experiencing and I’ll miss you terribly…

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 31, 2004 at 5:05 am

Taken from the Loews Cineplex 1999 Annual Report: “1975 Funny Lady premiers at Loews Astor Plaza, Still the largest auditorium in New York City with over 1,400 seats”

Was there tonight to see “The Village” quite a turn out for the 9:15 Show.It was really something to be in that giant auditorium and see those huge red velvet drapes closed over the movie screen. I sat in the back balcony section to get the full effect of vast expanse of grey seats in front of me. The Village is in the flat screen format, so I didn’t get the full effect of the huge 61' sceen, but I stayed till the end of the credits to see the drapes close, it was a sad sight. I agree with you guys, its our hole in the ground. Farewell Loews Astor Plaza, some of us will really miss you!

Shade
Shade on July 30, 2004 at 10:19 pm

I remember Titanic playing there for a week or so recently. It was a little jarring to walk down the street and see Titanic up there again several years after it had opened. Kinda wish I saw it again, just for that large effect. My first Titanic screening was in one of the little boxes at the Chelsea 23. Not as cool. Did see it once at the Astor.

Now I really wish I saw 2001 twice. I remember how they just dumped that thing out there. I remember it was a supergreat experience and people did clap and cheer when it played.

I know W——– likes to rag on all of us young people for the crime of not being old enough to be alive to visit New York’s grand old movie palaces, but the Astor Plaza was my first big giant theater experience in New York, and no matter how much he wants to put on his jackboots and stomp all over my pleasant memories, I’ll have them.

I’ll miss my event movies in Times Square. I loved standing in a line in TIMES SQUARE to see a movie in a giant theater with a big crowd. I loved leaving a movie in TIMES SQUARE and seeing everyone bustling around, and the long lines outside even recent features like Lord of the Rings. I loved seeing the Grindhouse logo and Shaw Brothers logo in a TIMES SQUARE theater during Kill Bill. As a little kid I used to dream about seeing movies in Times Square. I moved here in 1992 and 42nd was already boarded up. I think there was one multiplex operating on the Deuce. Never made it in there that I remember. Visited the Embassy a couple times for crap like Judge Dredd. Ran into a couple of the porno places right before they went away, but the movie-theater New York I used to dream about was long gone by the time I got here.

I got one night at the Bleecker Street Cinema before it was gone. Saw The Kingdom at the Anjelika 57. The nondescript and bland Art Greenwich was at least a neighborhood theater for me. I saw Donnie Darko last night in a modern box on 42nd.

As crappy as the projection had been for years, as terrible as those faded posters for King Kong and Superman II were all those years, going down into that ‘hole in the ground’ was always a great experience for me. It felt pretty wild to go down such a long escalator to experience a new film. And that huge lobby and the standees all around. Especially before the two 42nd Street theaters closed, back when the Astor was THE place to go, and lines would form and huge audiences would show up.

I’d prefer not to have my heart stomped on during the final days of the bare tendrils of memory I can drag out of today’s soulless New York. But it’s a “free country,” which means we can pee on each other’s tears all we want.

Me, I’m going to remember the Astor Plaza fondly.

I’ll be there Sunday, for the last show of The Village at 10:15 pm. Watching the curtains close, and holding back a sob. That ‘hole in the ground’ is leaving a hole in my heart.

YMike
YMike on July 30, 2004 at 7:11 pm

I saw Titanic there on April 15,1998. It was the late show and the theatre was fairly empty but what a great theatre to see that film in. Sound and picture were great. It’s too bad they couldn’t bring back some classic films like Star Wars or Titanic for the Astor’s last week instead of the village. I bet more people would have come for those films.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 30, 2004 at 4:29 pm

“2001” had a fine presentation at the Astor Plaza, good and loud! The only thing they did wrong was leave out the intermission, but they played the overture over closed curtains, and there were no commercials or previews to spoil the show. It was like 1968 all over again. At the end of one show they left the theater lights off when the credits were over while the exit music played, so you had to find your way to the exit doors in the dark. Whether it was a mistake or not, I don’t know, but it was effective. One of the Friday night shows had a fairly big crowd with the center section almost completely full, amazing in spite of practically no advertising (one tiny ad in the New York Times was all I could find). It was total word of mouth, and the faithful fans came. I also saw it there on the afternoon of New Year’s Eve 2001, for obvious reasons.

umbaba
umbaba on July 30, 2004 at 2:59 pm

ASTOR MEMORIES??…The first movie I saw there was 1492…a beat flick made better by the presentation (I believe it was 70MM)

I really enjoyed seeing The Godfather there in 97, on the big screen and I did see 2001 re-issue in Dec. 2001. I had forgotton it was 70MM. It was great although they never publicized it and there were maybe 20 people there. A damn shame. I just saw Spiderman 2 and I might venture in to see The Village. Yes, it’s a hole in the ground, but the fact that it’s a big screen, great sound and picture AND the last of the single screens does make these tributes more nostalgic.

IanJudge
IanJudge on July 29, 2004 at 10:38 pm

I believe that Loew’s became Loews sometime between 1968 and 1972. I am not really sure why… but it may have been related to the fact that the Tisch family (who conrolled Loew’s at the time) turned “Loew’s Theatres, Inc.” into “Loews Corporation” (with the theater company as a subsidiary). This new Loews Corp. (which still exists today as a conglomerate) is not to be confused with the original Loew’s, Inc. (M-G-M and Loew’s Theatres).

Loews Corporation spun off Loews Theatres in the 80’s. It was owned by TriStar Pictures, taken over in turn by Coca-Cola, sold to Sony. The name change from Loews to Sony Theatres was to reflect the fact that Sony was so supposedly advanced with technology that people would be convinced that a “Sony” theater would have to have superior equipment, etc. This would perhaps have worked if all the old and dreary Loews became amazing hi-tech Sony’s overnight, but clearly, the older theatres did not change much more than the marquee.

When Sony knew it was looking to spin off the theater chain once again (merging it with Cineplex Odeon) they changed the name back to Loews because 1) Loews is a familiar and historic brand name, and 2) they didn’t want a company they didn’t own to use the name Sony.

I would think that, since Loews Theatres is not related to Loews Corporation, they would bring the apostrophe back, to distinguish themselves from the conglomerate, but I would imagine, just as with all the other issues discussed on this page, they just plain don’t care.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on July 29, 2004 at 9:16 pm

Go Warren you said it like it is. As I’ve said many a time but never enough I remember when this was literally a hole in the ground in ‘68 and it’s always remained one. Now lets hope that Toys R Us goes bust and we can rebuild the great Criterion.(by the way it used to get the second runs after the Astor Plaza because the idiots that be never gave it the first runs. Superman looked so good on that screen.) New York is not the same without you Criterion.

William
William on July 29, 2004 at 9:15 pm

It’s not MTV thats taking over the theatre. And Viacom does not own the building, they are just a tenant.

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 29, 2004 at 8:55 pm

When you think of all the theatre chains in the NYC area that have come and gone such as: RKO, Fox Metropolitan, Century, Paramount, Skouras, Brandts, Interboro, Randforce, Golden, Stanley-Warner, I’m glad the name Loews still exists albeit as a very pale imitation of it’s former glorious past in the NYC metro area.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on July 29, 2004 at 8:43 pm

I agree. I thought Sony was also a stupid name for a theater chain.

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 29, 2004 at 8:40 pm

Sony Theatres was a silly name, when you think of the movies you think “LOEWS”. When I think of my tv set or walkman I think of Sony. I’m glad they got rid of the name Sony Theatres.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on July 29, 2004 at 8:34 pm

The first time I ever went to NYC was in 1975. Funny LAdy was playing at Loews State than in theater one and theater 2 had Dillinger. In the early 90’s Sony purchased Lowes and ran all the theaters under Sony. Even when the State reopen it was known as Sony State. I htink when they merged with Cineplex Odeon, they went back to using the Loews name. Loews also operated The Festival on 57th St breifly and the Paris. When they took over the PAris they changed the name to Loews Fine Arts. I don’t knoiw hwwat happened, but they didn’t run the theater very long.

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 29, 2004 at 8:30 pm

Back in 2000, when Loews Cineplex was still a publicly traded company they featured a vintage picture of the Loews Astor Plaza in their annual report. It was being used for the world premier of the film “Funny Lady” which came out in 1975, the theatre must have been around for a year at this point. The very front of the marquee said LOEWS Astor Plaza in big red letters. In what year did Loews drop the name Loew’s and start using just plain Loews?

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 29, 2004 at 8:20 pm

If the picture won’t open, try this:

http://www.malcolmmcdowell.net/

Go to Kubrick Media Mentions, then click on Pictures, then click on 2001 in 2001.

Another tribute to the Astor Plaza: I could be wrong, but I think the Astor Plaza has more comments on its page than any other theater in Cinema Treasures, even more than Radio City Music Hall! Here’s one more …

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on July 29, 2004 at 8:17 pm

Excerpt from the Reuters article:

>>Worth noting, too: In the 1940s, several of today’s legit houses were used exclusively as first-run movie houses, including the Palace with 1,700 seats, the Lunt-Fontanne, then known as the Globe, with 1,500 seats, the Broadway, the Winter Garden and the Ambassador.

Maybe we can convince the Messrs. Shubert and Nederlander (and Jujamcyn) to return one of these houses for exclusive first fun movies and premieres.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on July 29, 2004 at 8:07 pm

Bill
I can’t access the web site.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 29, 2004 at 8:02 pm

One Astor Plaza memory that just came to mind: during the first showing on the first day of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, a small section of the ceiling fell in. No one was hurt, fortunately. I guess they had their great sound system turned up a little too loud :)

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 29, 2004 at 7:53 pm

Your welcome Bill!
I was there for the 2001 reissue, It was something that all fans of huge 70mm roadshow films should get to experience. I still have my ticket tucked away someplace, gotta go find it. I plan on going there one last time to see the village, will any of you cinematreasures folks be there as well?

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 29, 2004 at 7:52 pm

Your welcome Bill!
I was there for the 2001 reissue, It was something that all fans of huge 70mm roadshow fans should get to experience. I still have my ticket tucked away someplace, gotta go find it. I plan on going there one last time to see the village, will any of you cinematreasures folks be there as well?