AFI Silver Theatre

8633 Colesville Road,
Silver Spring, MD 20910

Unfavorite 24 people favorited this theater

Showing 201 - 225 of 374 comments

Giles
Giles on September 14, 2012 at 5:21 pm

the severe color tinting of ‘South Pacific’ is also a tad distracting if you ask me. Fox did a boffo hidef transfer and the bluray is sharp as a tack, so I guess I should expect the print to not look as good then :(

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on September 14, 2012 at 5:04 pm

If it is the same print of “South Pacific” that was shown at the 70mm Festival at the Seattle Cinerama last year you might be a little disappointed; that print was in fair condition, but the film deserves some sort of award for the “Least Imaginative Use of Wide-Screen Photography.” Joshua Logan was a great Broadway director, but I do not think he had any insight into how to use Todd-AO.

Giles
Giles on September 14, 2012 at 4:49 pm

yes, I did see ‘Lord Jim’ and I thought the print looked stunning. I guess since this is rarely shown the print hadn’t had so much wear and tear that usual 70mm prints of ‘2001’ have. The blue skies (including the eyes of Peter O'Toole) were so lifelike

Equally ‘Khartoum’ was visually astounding – the five front channel spread was meticulous and powerful (I love the music score by the way). I had forgotten for films at 2.76 the screen doesn’t spread horizontally, like at the Uptown, but drops down from the top.

I gathered from what Mr. Guttag has noted to me in the recent past, is that the Silver can’t playback films in DCP harddrive form – I might be wrong, but something like ‘Prometheus’ or any newer film for that matter has to be 35mm. I didn’t see ‘Prometheus’ in IMAX, but the DCP I saw at the Cinemark Egyptian (3D) XD screen had a truly amazing 7.1 mix that wouldn’t be featured as such in IMAX – nor at the upcoming Silver showing. I think it would be cool if the Silver could see if Fox has any 70mm prints of ‘Alien’ or ‘Aliens’

oh, and I’m checking out ‘South Pacific’ on Sunday afternoon ]

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on September 14, 2012 at 4:17 pm

Quickly looking at the Internet for what has been shown elsewhere, I think it is likely that “South Pacific” will be shown in 70 mm, 6 track stereo. I’d still be eager to hear about the sound track of “Khartoum” that was shown. Did anybody see “Lord Jim”?

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on September 9, 2012 at 3:54 pm

I just looked through the AFI calendar and they have scheduled the Alien movies in November! No word on 70mm anything. I’ve only seen Aliens in 70mm, at the closed Fine Arts downtown. I suppose it will be Alien, the director’s edition in digital. The rest probably all film. At least Aliens should be the expanded edition. Prometheus is scheduled, but that is best experienced in IMAX Digital 3D. The ship’s tactical displays show off the format in its dimension and clarity.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on September 1, 2012 at 9:55 pm

JodarMovieFan, I saw Jurassic Park in digital sound, DTS, I think, at the Uptown when it was issued in 1993. An Internet search indicated Khartoum prints had been put in DTS sound. I’m hoping Mr. Guttag will clarify.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on September 1, 2012 at 9:39 pm

Howard, it seems you’re recent 70mm experience has been the same as mine. The sound is all coming from the front. Disappointing. Maybe Steve can shed some light on this if/when he sees these postings.

For all we know, we could be duped into watching 35mm and 4 track stereo and be fooled. :) Probably not.

If the AFI can play all formats, then the question is what prints arrived and was the AFI able to play them the way it should be exhibited? We can reasonably assume that the 70mm presentations were most likely run by a projectionist, especially the rare titles. It seems studios would like to protect these prints and not risk damage do them by platters. Then again, who is to say a projectionist could not mess it up..drop his drink on the print, touch it with dirty hands..etc.

My love for movies is, in part, the experience and 70mm played a great part of it, even if most of them were blow ups from 35 mm.

Curious about your DTS comment. When you surmise the newer print was with DTS and not 6 track mag, do you meant to say that DTS in the newer prints has diminished sound compared to the original? I thought the digital sound takes the original and cleans up scratches and other unwanted noise and enhances the fidelity of the original. If this is true, then DTS should exceed the original.

My first DTS experience was ‘Jurassic Park’ @ the Universal Studios theater and that THX-certified auditorium was rocking loud and booming. All they needed to do is add smellovision and you could smell T-Rex’s breath in addition to his roar. :)

Cumulo
Cumulo on September 1, 2012 at 9:21 am

A month ago I came here for the first time and saw “The Bourne Identity”, which I missed during its original run. It took a second to get used to 35mm again.

I guess the print was from 2002, but it was in excellent shape. Some minor scratches on the right hand side about 20 minutes in that didn’t last long. Phenomenal sound too.

Really impressive overall. I will see “The Master” in 70mm here.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on August 26, 2012 at 1:21 pm

I saw “Khartoum” yesterday (meeting none of you but a local friend joined me) & posted a photo of it on the marquee (though during day, not eve when vertical lights up). The movie was enjoyable. All the bells & whistles were employed starting with overture music before curtain opened, and including intermission after 1.5 hours. It seemed to be in 2.76 wide aspect ratio. The print looked excellent. The sound was from behind the screen. I will guess this was a newer print with DTS sound rather than 6 track, but I would like to know if anybody can post.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on August 24, 2012 at 1:11 pm

What aspect ratio will Khartoum be shown? 2.35 scope or the wider 2.75 or 2.76 various websites say it was originally shown? http://www.reelclassics.com/Techtalk/aspectratio-graphics.htm

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on August 23, 2012 at 6:52 pm

though I wrote the Intro & that “Juno” profile photo is mine, I almost never get to attend here since I live in Philly but I will see “Khartoum” on Saturday. I’ve changed my own profile photo so if any of you would like to say hello before or after the movie, you know what I look like! (but will be minus suit & tie).

Giles
Giles on August 23, 2012 at 12:34 am

five front channel sound tends to be very front heavy Jodar – and for it’s time it sounded great – 8-track SDDS with five front + stereo surround sounded even more impressive! (let’s hope this configurement winds up on DCI sooner than later). I can’t wait to see ‘Khartoum’ and ‘Lord Jim’ next week.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on August 22, 2012 at 11:36 pm

Steve, is the “Khartoum” film (Saturday) a 6 track print, with the sound on the film or is it a newer DTS print? any idea when the print is from?

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on August 21, 2012 at 2:29 am

Thanks for the info CSW. I remember reading something about the exhibition rights to ‘Porgy and Bess’ on the Ziegfeld thread. Thats too bad we couldn’t get it.

Howard, its ok. Its not like I bought advance tickets way in advance. Unless there is buzz in the news that there is a BIG event, I usually don’t buy movie tickets until the day of showing.

I did catch Sundays 8/19 70mm presentation of ‘Its a Mad Mad Mad Mad World.’ In spite of the rainy weather, there was a decent turn out.
As usual, they did not have pretzels of any kind and the usual ‘the truck has not arrived with supplies’ excuse was given.

The print looked good; very colorful, especially Ethel Merman’s red hair. Compared to the annual runs on ABC years ago, it was a treat to see it on the big screen without the annoying pan and scan motion of broadcast tv viewing. Its also great to see what older sitcom stars from the 70s did in movies like this. Norman Fell playing the Detective comes to mind. To see the Three Stooges, in color and on the widescreen, even though it was for that one scene at the airport was pleasant.

As with my experience with the 70mm ‘Hello Dolly’ and ‘West Side Story’ the stereo sound is mostly all up front. I was hoping for at least some car zooms and whooshes from the side and rear theater speakers. The sound was most alive during the end car chase between Sylvester and Otto. I suppose the sound should have been louder. As such, those presentations, from my perspective and those who want to disagree..fine, were less immersive than my anticipation for viewing these classics turned out to be.

I was looking forward to the much talked about sound chatter and sirens during intermission but there was nothing but a musical interlude.

The travel curtain was used throughout. Well done, but whatever text card they put up at the very beginning could not be read over the curtain ripples at all.

I’m wondering if the Cinerama Dome presentation will be of the same print or something else.

Looks like ‘2001’ will have a repeat performance in early Sept. Maybe it will be worth another look.

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on August 19, 2012 at 9:08 am

The reasons for the nonavailability of exhibition rights to “Porgy and Bess” are somewhat complex, but the crux of the matter is that exhibition rights to the film are now very strictly controlled by the Gershwin and Heyward estates; producer Samuel Goldwyn lost the rights he purchased to make the film in 1972, and prints of the film, even in 35mm, are very hard to secure. My guess is that someone at AFI jumped the gun and announced the showing before the exhibition agreement was finalized.

I have read that the Gershwin and Heyward estates make showing the film very difficult, in terms of both access to surviving prints and costs The film had a very troubled production history (you can read about this at both the IMDb and at its entry at Wikipedia). Both estates were (and apparently still are) very unhappy with film as was the distributor (Columbia); the film flopped badly when released. There was a showing some years ago at the Ziegfeld in NYC, but I would say if you ever see the film again theatrically, it will be under some very unusual circumstances.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on August 19, 2012 at 1:13 am

JodarMovieFan, I’m sorry. I heard weeks ago of Porgy & Bess cancelation. I should’ve posted it here. I think that was because of ownership not theater competition.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on August 18, 2012 at 11:28 pm

I was just glancing through the list of movies for the 70mm retro and just discovered that they cancelled the Sep 3 showing of ‘Porgy and Bess’ due to rights clearances. Recalling the Senator’s blog of clearance rights by its competitor the Charles, I was thinking to myself, who would exercise their right NOT to show the movie. Doesn’t make sense. Maybe this can be worked out in the near future. 2001 is rebooked again..ho hum.

I hope to make it tomorrow to the ‘Mad’ showing and get my favorite house seat. :)

sguttag
sguttag on August 18, 2012 at 4:36 am

Its a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World is playing in Ultra Panavision 70mm this weekend at the AFI/Silver

sguttag
sguttag on July 1, 2012 at 10:57 pm

Patton was in 70mm DTS and did retain the original mix. Not all new prints are DTS…remember if one is doing a one-off or two-off…there is an extra step in creating the DTS track and then printing it.

Giles
Giles on June 29, 2012 at 1:55 am

I thought DTS 70mm prints retained the five front channel configurement? I agree about wanting to seeing the few 70mm animated films on the big screen: ‘Sleeping Beauty’, ‘The Black Cauldron’. As for the rare screening of ‘Porgy and Bess’ … two screenings on the Labor Day weekend Sunday and Monday in the afternoon … really?… again (I refer back to ‘Patton’ on Memorial Day weekend)… I have to sacrifice one of the weekend days – crap! A Tuesday evening would have been more ideal – hell, any evening screening is more ideal than the 1pm and 4pm screenings that seem to be the norm for this premier festival – what sucky times.

It’s a shame that ‘Cleopatra’ wasn’t available – the new UK bluray of the film is pretty spectacular looking though.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on June 29, 2012 at 12:23 am

I know. I’m not complaining. I’m looking forward to the rarer titles such as ‘Mad Mad Mad World’, ‘Porgy & Bess’.

Even on this site, they report LA/Hollywood theater 70mm festivals with different titles not seen in ages. Sleeping Beauty comes to mind. I’ve never seen a 70mm animated movie before..unless you count Roger Rabbit back in ‘88 at the Uptown. Yeah, that was blow up, too.

Steve, do you know if the 70mm films shown are newer prints with DTS or original 70mm with 6 track mag tracks?

sguttag
sguttag on June 24, 2012 at 3:48 pm

Remember, the trick is to get things that are actually available. Also, the goal was for movies shot in 65mm or VV. Star Trek was all shot 35mm CinemaScope. It is a decent first offering of a festival and diverse.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on June 23, 2012 at 3:53 pm

Ho hum. They’ve always had 2001 and Lawrence. ‘Tron’ and ‘West Side’ was recent ones, too. Other then Porgy (which is rare) and “Its a Mad Mad Mad..World' and ‘Spartacus’ it doesn’t really excite me. And no Star Trek :P not even in the 80s retrospective series. I suppose we’re lucky to get what is programmed. Given what LA has, you’d think we’d get something different.

Giles
Giles on June 14, 2012 at 5:34 pm

the new end of June to September program guide is up online – and oh what a summer! Another round of Totally Awesome 80’s – AND… drum roll please, the first 70mm film fest with ‘It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World’ ‘Spartacus’ ‘2001’ ‘Those Magnificent Men in their Flying Machines’ ‘Khartoum’ ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’ ‘West Side Story’ ‘Porgy and Bess’ ‘Baraka’ ‘Tron’ ‘Lord Jim’ and ‘South Pacific’

sguttag
sguttag on May 6, 2012 at 3:35 am

Patton will be playing there on Memorial Sunday/Monday! They are going to try and get as many titles as possible.