Loew's 46th Street Theatre

4515 New Utrecht Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11219

Unfavorite 17 people favorited this theater

Showing 201 - 225 of 280 comments

ERD
ERD on October 28, 2005 at 11:59 am

Many religous groups of Borough Park did not want any theatres when they moved into the neighborhood. They had and have political influence. The nearby Boro Park theatre had riots outside when it showed Yiddish shows on Saturday.(The Sabbath).The theatre shortly closed (after showing “X” rated films in retaliation) I am sure the banks were aware of this.

Bway
Bway on October 28, 2005 at 11:35 am

Too bad it didn'thappen.
As for the “evils” of cutting up an old theater into a “multiplex”, it’s a two sided street. What’s worse, take for example the Ridgewood Theatre in Ridgewood. It was cut up into 5 screens (two in the orchestra and three in the balcony). However, it is STILL puttering on, and showing movies after all these years, long after most theaters have been closed, altered, or worse, demolished. Is that worse than the fate of the 46th St, that never was cut up, but is rotting before their eyes being used as a warehouse? Or worse, like the RKO Madison, still existing, never cut up for multiplexing, but compltetely gutted? It’s a tough question. Multiplexing “may” have allowed the theater to survive, and still show movies like it’s supposed to….but then again, the glory of the interior would be altered and harmed. Hard to say what’s worse….
For me, I much rather see the Ridgewood cut up, but still showing movies, rather than being used as a furniture store warehouse…..

Theaterat
Theaterat on October 26, 2005 at 2:49 pm

I have an interesting story regarding this theater. I was on a cruise vacation to Bermuda recently. There was an elderly couple I met who were from Toronto, Canada.We got to talking, and the gentleman said he was originally from Brooklyn, bur moved to Canada some 15 years ago whedn he retired.Afyer much talk about ?the old neighborhoods" somehow the conversation came to movie theaters. He asked me how many were left in Brooklyn, and I told him about 9 or 10. Then he asked me if I remembered the 46th. St.I told him vividly. It seems that this fellow, who worked in real estate sales was attempting to re-open the 46th.st with a few friends back in 1975.The plan was to re=furbish the then recently closed theater and bring movies and other events back to Boro Park. The plan sounded great and was almost a go until 3 banks turned them down. Part of the plan was to have an “unemployment special” where if you showed your unemployment card, you got a discount! They also planned to have Saturday kids matinees like in the “old days”.Also on the agenda were Yiddish shows for the Hassidic community, and concerts or opera music. There was also talk about screening the big screen epics such as < Lawrence of Arabia",“ Around the World in 80 Days”, “The 10 Commandments”, “Sparticus”, “ Doctor Zhivago” and others. I must admit, this was a great idea. Obviously he thought so too.This was at the dawn of the multiplex era, but he said to cut up and gut this theater would be a tragedy.He asked me if I am a moviegoer. I told him that I used to be, but the overall lousy quality of todays movies,and the equally bad multiplexes we have to see them at is keeping me away. He agreed on that! I told him about this website, and he sounded interested in it! Too bad he doesn`t have a computer!

jw10ec
jw10ec on September 26, 2005 at 10:29 am

The night the Dead played was truly remarkable. The house was packed and people stood “armpit to armpit!” There was a sense of awe and excitement that the Greatful Dead had come to Brooklyn and to Boropark no less! Garcia’s piercing solos, the visceral base riffs and the songs we all knew… oh what an affirmation. We were part of a bigger world and the world knew we were here. Our ears rang for a week afterwards. Then it was a good thing. Now we call it tinnitus.

coneyislandboy
coneyislandboy on September 26, 2005 at 2:45 am

Wow, I was only 10 when the dead played,I wish I was there,what a treasure !! Steve

Bway
Bway on August 6, 2005 at 12:23 am

Warren, did you take any photos inside when you were in there?

ERD
ERD on August 5, 2005 at 12:57 pm

I would like to thank Warren for his expertise information & contributions he has given to this site. It is greatly appreciated.

ERD
ERD on August 5, 2005 at 12:02 am

When going to Loew’s 46th Street, I seem to recall a large statue on top of the proscenium. I do not notice it in Warren’s picture. Did Loew’s do some decorative changes when it bought the Universal? Also, unlike the Oriental and Fortway, I don’t think Loew’s 46th Street or Loew’s Boro Park had an organ.

Theaterat
Theaterat on July 31, 2005 at 2:14 pm

Great, Warren! Where did you get these photos from?

mchma367
mchma367 on July 30, 2005 at 3:19 am

That is a really wonderful picture you found Warren. Thank you for sharing that photograph. I used to live at 4615 New Utrecht about half a block from the Loew’s 46th. I’m going to email my dad a link to the photo so he can see what the theater looked like when he was 2 years old. I did notice the photo was cropped at the top. I guess the photographer didn’t like photographing the bottom of the EL. I’m not familiar with the silent film on the marquee, but I did recognize the actors. Rod Laroque is more well known for playing “The Shadow” and Warner Oland was the actor who portrayed Charlie Chan in the 1930’s and 1940’s. I also noticed there was a stage show advertised. The Universal Marquee certainly was grand. I have been trying to find a photograph of the theater from the 1960’s but I haven’t been able to get my hands on it. When I do I will try to share it with everyone on this page.

Theaterat
Theaterat on July 27, 2005 at 2:22 pm

Lady Rigel…You are exactly right, but the reality of it is that too many people just do not give a hoot.I was greatly saddened when the Oriental closed, but when I asked people to get involved in an effort to save it nobody cared. Similiar efforts are going on with the Kings- read all the posts- but, again there seems to be nothing concrete other than a few ideas people are kicking around. There were Many great theaters in Brooklyn, but I guess the expense of operating and maintaining them was just too prohibitive. Then theres the current very sad state of the film industry itself.Just too many films are being released and too many of them are remakes, sequeld or creatively bankrupt rethreads of old TV shows ala The Honeymooners, Bewitched, and The Dukes of Hazzard.And the backlash is showing at the box officed. In the Pre DVD, VCR, Cable, and Movies on Demand days, a film had a longer “shelf life” and generally played a lot longer than todays releases. The fact of the matter is that the grand old movie palaces are an anachronism, a thing of the past. We all could get involved in an effort to save them, but in reality who really cares about them other than people like us.

rigelstar
rigelstar on July 27, 2005 at 12:25 pm

It would be great if there was someone who had the money to invest in restoring these palaces however we have to remember why they closed in the first place. The community in which most of these places exist did/would not appreciate these places as much as they should be appreciated. It is sad that the community didn’t do anything in the first place when these theaters first closed.

It is great that there are a handful of us that understand and appreciate these wonderful movie palaces, however in the grand scheme of things, we are too few and far between.

frankie
frankie on July 21, 2005 at 1:36 pm

I fondly remember seeing “Peyton Place” and “You’re a Big Boy Now” at the Loew’s 46th Street just after getting out of the army. I was FREE !!! frankie from Brooklyn

frankie
frankie on July 21, 2005 at 1:33 pm

I lived in Flatbush from 1968 to 1975 and saw “Airport” at the Kenmore, “Romeo & Juliet” at the Astor, “The Anniversary” with Bette Davis at the Albemarle, “The Legend of Lylah Clare” at the glorious Kingsway, and “Mame” at the Rialto. Talk about an embarrassment of riches ! Flatbush Avenue was almost like Brooklyn’s Times Square. Remember the ice cream parlors, book stores, record stores,and coffee shops ? I was a young man on my own just out of the army, and I’m glad i came in on the tale end of it. Who remembers The Circus Lounge, a gay bar on Flatbush & Foster that became Kitchen City, I believe ? frankie from Brooklyn

theatrefan
theatrefan on July 12, 2005 at 8:47 am

On September 14th 1966, Eton Amusement Corp (A Loews subsidiary) transfered ownership of the Loews 46th Street from itself to the 46th St. Theatre Corp. There have been several transfers of ownership of this former theatre since then.

Theaterat
Theaterat on May 17, 2005 at 7:15 pm

Mike M… That is a great idea except for……………………. Anyway, you get the idea.Providing entertainment for ALL the residents of various ethnic backgrounds would be fine if somebody took an iniative and started. Nice as the 46th.st was: and it was very nice) I would rather put my efforts small as they may be in an attempt to save the even grander Loews Kings.If ypu ever were there, you know what a magnificent theater this was… and could be again

mchma367
mchma367 on May 14, 2005 at 9:54 pm

In one of the earlier paragraphs on this page one of the members was able to get in and see the remnants of the old theater. I don’t think too much could have changed in a year. I will be visiting New York next month to see my sister who lives in Long Island. I’m hoping she will drive us to see the old neighborhood and maybe walk around a little. I’m still looking for a good picture of the theater from the 60’s. I found one photograph, but it doesn’t have a real clear view of the theater. I will keep looking. I’ve seen some recent photos of the neighborhood along New Utrecht ave. and it seems like the area is recovering from the hard times in the 70’s and 80’s. A working theater would do wonders for this neighborhood, but it would have to provide entertainment that is suitable to the people that live and work there.

Theaterat
Theaterat on April 28, 2005 at 7:21 pm

Went back to the 46th.st yesterday.(4 27) The manager was nowhere to be found, but the person I spoke to said quote-“the manager is tired of wierdos and cultists trying to see what is left of the theater It is closed, and that is that”. He did let me look around, but the area that is closed to the public was off limits to me. I tried.

mchma367
mchma367 on April 20, 2005 at 4:48 am

I hope the theater owners browse this web page theaterat. Maybe they will get the idea. Hey Bway…thanks for finding this bridgeandtunnelclub web page. I actually recognized some of the buildings in the borough park area. I was surprised that the old candy store and soda shop was still in business. The movie theater still looks pretty good. A lot of Architects would love to have that much to work with for a renovation and restoration project. The yellow brick always made the theater look like a golden palace. It’s a shame to see so many empty and defaced store fronts. Lostmemory I’m impressed. Where did you get this information? I think you are correct, the building on record predates the movie theater. I believe the street numbers are assigned to the buildings based on the city water meter that serves that building. I assume that the movie theater was built on the 4515 lot and the corner lot. I may have some photographs of the 46th street theater that go back to the early 60’s but it may take me a while to scan the photos.

Bway
Bway on April 18, 2005 at 5:22 pm

Warren, I assume they don’t allow me to remote post a link to an individual photo.
Anyway, here’s the page I found it on, scroll down about 6 photos or so. This should work:

View link

Theaterat
Theaterat on April 18, 2005 at 4:50 pm

Mike M…. You are right to a certain extent. Went to the Sheepshead multiplex recently, and the renovated plex did hace “stadium style"seating. This "feature” is kind of like a balcony with no orchestra level, and the seats were adjustable.But the theater was still very dirty and the stench from the popcorn and butter was so overwhelming, it seems to have been piped in through the air conditioning vents. Also, my idea of a good time is NOT seeing some overhyped movie based on a comic book or an old TV series.The kind of well made foreign films that Siskel and Roeper give “thumbs up” to just do not play at the plexes. Guess the owners feel they will not do good business, so films like “The Pacifier"are favored. In reality, they are not doing mature moviegoers a favor, so adult attendeace is dropping.It may be sad, but it is true.

Bway
Bway on April 18, 2005 at 4:38 pm

Here’s a photo of the 46th Street theater taken from street level that I found on the web.

mchma367
mchma367 on April 16, 2005 at 4:24 am

You are not alone in your feelings Theaterat. With a few exceptions the quality of movies in general has slowly declined since the early 70’s. That decline in quality I think is partly due to the decline of the old studio system which prided itself on producing quality films even though it treated the actors like property. When more actors started making more money there was less money for production values. You might also notice that our greatest films came from some of our greatest novels and literary minds. With a few exceptions the quality of our literature has also declined since the early 70’s and I include comic books as literature, so it’s no wonder the quality of movies has gone down. To be honest it’s been an up hill battle for movie theaters in the battle with television for the audience. In the old days your movie ticket would let you see two movies, a newsreel, cartoons, a short movie feature, a serial episode. Now all you get is one movie not as good as last weeks movie trailer and overpriced popcorn and soda. The Loew’s movie houses were always top notch because they were owned by a big company. When movie houses were owned by independent operators the profit margins were very small so the theaters became simple no frills black boxes. That is starting to change now with larger multi-screen theaters incorporating some of the features of the old movie palaces such as better seating and retro interior design. Don’t worry Bway…no rocks being thrown here.

Bway
Bway on April 15, 2005 at 3:33 am

Personally, believe it or not, I just kinda love old buildings in general, but of course that would make me interested in old theaters too, so that’s why I’m here. That coupled with enjoying movies too (and yes, especially in an old theater) makes this an interesting site for me.
I have to admidt though (and please keep the rocks small when you all start throwing them at me), I do enjoy some of the newer theaters too, especially when built in the style of a theater like The AMC Pleasure Island near Orlando or Island 16 in Holtsville I do admidt that I love the stadium seating, the comfortable large chairs where the armrests can go up when unbusy, and it is almost like a couch.
While nothing will compare to the old movie palaces, I can’t really knock many of the newer multiplexes either. And I don’t mean the junk that was built in the 70’s and 80’s, I mean the more “delux” ones like National Amusements and AMC have been putting up lately.