Penypak Theatre

8049 Frankford Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA 19136

Unfavorite 2 people favorited this theater

Showing 1 - 25 of 41 comments

dallasmovietheaters
dallasmovietheaters on February 18, 2022 at 4:50 am

Warner-Equity Theatres launched the new Holme Theatre with sound pictures on October 11, 1929 with “On With the Show” supported by “Look Out Below.” The theatre was named after Thomas Holme and was in the Holemsburg neighborhood of Philly. The Holme closed after the January 8, 1942 showing of “Hold That Ghost” for a major $100,000 refresh. On March 17, 1942, it was relaunched as the Penypak Theatre with Kay Kyser in “The Playmates.”

The Penypak scuffled in the 1950s along with many neighborhood movie houses. In 1950, the independent operator, Melvin Fox, sued the eight major Hollywood distributors citing a cartel that didn’t allow it access to key first run films. That and similar suits at that time around the country led to the Paramount decree that would break up the cartel. The Penypak Theatre initially closed at the expiry of a leasing period on September 27, 1951 with “The Great Caruso.” The former Penypak became the short-lived Herby’s Auction House. A boy got his hand stuck in the Penypak popcorn machine during an auction requiring rescue by the fire department. The auction house closed early in 1954 with the building offered for sale.

The Penypak re-emerged on a grind policy by Mr. Fox on May 8, 1955 with “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea” and “Desiree.” The venue had a new 40' screen and widescreen projection to present CinemaScope titles. But the Penypak’s audience loss was not stemmed and it soon cased operations on October 30, 1955 with Anne Appleton in the exploitation film, “The Desperate Women,” supported by Richard Coogan in “Girl on the Run” ending the venue’s cinematic journey.

After being offered for sale without a buyer, the theatre was auctioned off on July 12, 1956 for $70,000. It resumed auction services for a short period. In 1959, it was a showplace with live plays by the Pinypak players. That only lasted three months closing just prior the theater’s 30th Anniversary. The building was again sold in 1962 for $52,500 to a furniture retailer beginning a long retail career.

TheALAN
TheALAN on December 21, 2013 at 9:10 pm

Glad to see that J.G. Caughie, who lived in Holmesburg, remembers that the marquee read PENYPAK – not Pennypack. Thanks!

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on June 20, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Compare this view to the photos of the facade in January 2006:
http://tinyurl.com/nywfjx

JGCaughie
JGCaughie on December 12, 2008 at 7:39 am

Glad to see so much interest in my favorite movie theatre. However, in the comments I’ve seen the name is spelled incorrectly. The marquee said PENYPAK – not Pennypack.

I believe it first closed as a movie house in 1951, the reopened April of 1954 with “20,000 Leagues Under the See” as its first feature. I think it closed for good in 1959.

I have fond memories of the Saturday afternoon shows – especially the comedy races. Each kid got a ticket numbered one thru 10 and if your number was the winner of the race, you got a prize.

Also had some good times as a young teenager at Herby’s Auction which I believe was the first business enterprise after the movie house closed.

J. G. Caughie
Former Holmesburg resident

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on April 30, 2008 at 1:08 am

Yes, that’s so typical of how it is around there now. It’s the current state of the Philadelphia economy, what more can I say?

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on January 18, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Thanks for providing the two links, Ken MC, while I’d be curious to know if that was the spelling used on the actual marquee. With my only memories being of when it was all boarded up back in the late ‘50s, I don’t recall the name “Pennypack” being alternatively spelled that way. [but of course I wouldn’t, since it was before I’d learned to read yet.] Meantime, to date I have yet to uncover any photo showing it after it went from being the Holme. Local businessman/Holmesburg native Rudy Definis published a book of historic Holmesburg which went on sale in December 2007, but even there it shows the theater only when it was the Holme. I’d love to see how it looked during the post-WWII optimism phase and with the new name given.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on January 18, 2008 at 7:44 am

Here are two interesting views from the Philadelphia Architects & Buildings site. The first is an architectural rendering. Note the different spelling. The second is a 1941 photo from the Irvin Glazer collection:
http://tinyurl.com/2ubcn5
http://tinyurl.com/33hksc

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on August 4, 2006 at 5:35 pm

Right now much of Holmesburg’s future fate hangs on Independence Pointe and its getting developed the right way. And that right way could be one of two things — either its returning to be a riverside shipping terminal (which is what it was last) or developed with housing and other things in such a way so that the end result isn’t a Katrina/Love Canal disaster combined. And likewise the Holme Theatre building’s future fate hangs on how Independence Pointe gets developed. And with Independence Pointe’s future fate on hold for now, so, too, is the Holme Theatre building’s, which is why the Holme Theatre building is being allowed to serve as a mini mall for now. And the upcoming election between Schwartz and Bhakta (November 2006) has a great deal to do with things as well. Schwartz (who’s the incumbant) fully supports the current plan for Independence Pointe, which will end up being a Katrina/Love Canal disaster when all is said and done, whereby Bhakta is a candidate of real substance and vision. Bhakta actually thinks.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on July 19, 2006 at 9:21 pm

Howard, the marquee that’s currently on the Holme Theatre is triangular — that is, it has two faces, both of which are at a slight angle to one another — and trust me, it is not the original marquee by any means. Meantime, even though I never got to experience the Holme when it still was open as a theater, that’s not to say I have no memories of it when it was a theater building. Having been renamed the Pennypack during its last years as a theater, I have good memories of when it was the Pennypack Theatre all boarded up, and by that point the triangular marquee was in place of the original rectangular one. My guess is they were attempting to make the theater look more modern among other things. I also remember the title that was on the marquee (perhaps missing a letter or two), it was “The White Sheep.” And that title remained there until the building was eventually reopened as other than a theater. Now interesting to note, right next door to the Holme Theatre building (where the lower half of the parking lot is today) had been Holme Drug Store, and looking at that one and only photo of when the Holme Theatre was in full swing (taken 1935 or so) it appears to me that when the Holme Theatre changed its name to Pennypack, the Holme Drug Store next door got the original Holme Theatre sign. Meantime, as for the Holme Theatre’s original marquee, going by that 1930s photo it looks like it doubled as an outdoor balcony of sorts. Hence explaining those doorway like formations in the original Art Deco upper part of the theater’s front exterior — which is still intact today (though the doorway formations have long been sealed up.)

When this theater was in its prime (when that 1930s photo was taken) Holmesburg had been involved in bootlegging activity during Prohibition. This I know, because my father grew up in a house somewhere along Frankford Avenue, and he remembered looking out the bedroom window late at night to hear muffled voices in an alleyway running behind the yards, and seeing shadowy figures and cars back there, and boxes of contraband being moved from one vehicle to another via flashlight. And then the cars would part their separate way. And just to show how little times have changed since then, back last October, when I attended the Holmesburg Civic Association meeting and it was the very first time I suggested the old Holme Theatre building be brought back as a neighbrhood movie theater again, the MAIN topic of that meeting that night was all the unsavory criminal activity (most of it illegal drug trafficking) going on in the historic old African American community that’s right behind the Holme Theatre building. The African Americans who live back there — and who are all very decent people, by the way — don’t want any part of that illegal drug scene but are forced to accept it anyway because they’re black in an area that when Rizzo came to power as Mayor in 1971 was mistakenly forced into becoming predominantly blue collar white and has been forced to be ever since. Today, however, it’s on its last leg with Councilwoman Joan Krajewski soon to be retiring, she being the last leftover up here from the Rizzo era. Which is why I’ve been saying all along that turning the old Holme Theatre building into a mini mall is a mistake. I was just trying to help the new owners from losing their shirts is all. At the same time, and this I didn’t know when I first came forth with the restoring it as a theater idea last autumn, it’s not quite time yet to make it a theater again. I was on the right track with that idea, but too much the early bird as it were. And as luck would have it I got the worm, to which I can only say “Yuck!!!”

Anyway, right now Holmesburg’s in that very in-between period, and I can’t invest, and I can’t sway other investors I’m teamed up with to invest, until the smoke finally clears on that. And the gambling that’s coming to Philadelphia is going to really muck things up both on my end and yours, Howard. Though on my end not quite as much as yours, since no slots parlors have been proposed for up here. But we do have this nuisance thing called the Independence Pointe development proposal (which isn’t far from the Holme Theatre building) to worry about. And that’s gotta be taken by the horns and steered the right way somehow. And it ain’t easy when those in charge of it, including U.S. Representative Allyson Schwartz, have I.Q.s something like -3. But she’ll be gone after next November, so I’m not too put off by that, just so long as we can keep the Independence Pointe proposal stalled till then. And so far so good on that.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on July 19, 2006 at 1:43 pm

Did it look the 1928 Art Deco marquee at Boyd, or the later 1953 version that’s still mostly there? www.FriendsOfTheBoyd.org and visit photo gallery’s Exterior gallery?

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on July 19, 2006 at 1:29 am

I wish somebody would’ve photographed the original marqueee when briefly visible. Even before gutting, I knew that a movie theater closed in the 1950’s wasn’t going to reopen. Even if a wealthy person renovated the theater to being any kind of theater, Art Deco or not, it wouldn’t exist as a daily mainstream single screener.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on July 11, 2006 at 6:06 pm

Howard, it closed sometime in the latter half of the 1950s. This I know for a fact because my older brother saw Walt Disney’s “Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier” there, and that movie was released in 1956. And Howard, if you sometime come up to Holmesburg to study the situation more carefully you would know that if it were made a theater again it could only be single screen. Two reasons for this: 1) The parking lot it has is not that large that it could accommodate anything more than that, and 2) it’s located in an area which is primarily residential, meaning that anything other than a single screen would be overwhelming for that location. And even though Frankford Avenue, which it faces upon, is a major Northeast Philadelphia thoroughfare, it is hardly Roosevelt Boulevard. In William H. Lee’s original design it had a 1,364 seat capacity. But in my restoration plan it would have somewhere between 600 and 700 seats tops. And though even those low figures exceed what its parking lot could accommodate, the fact that it’s located in a spot which is easy to get to via public transit, on foot or by bike makes that seating number practical.

Now in terms of why back in the ‘50s it didn’t survive as a theater, while the advent of TV was partially to blame, the biggest reason of all was because it wasn’t wide-screen plus it totally paled with the much more modern theaters down in Mayfair, the Mayfair Theatre and the Merben. And I’m also pretty sure it wasn’t air-conditioned. And given that very narrow sidewalk it has in front, and with it arranged at that time so people had to stand outside to buy a ticket, I’m sure that was probably a huge turn-off, too. And unlike today, back when it was last a theater it was squeezed tightly between other businesses. There wasn’t any parking lot at all.

So contrast all that to today where there are no classy single screen theaters around it anywhere and so on. And now it does have a parking lot which it didn’t have before.

But I’ll be the first to agree with you, Howard, that there are a lot of uncertainties about making it a single screen theater again. And Wall Street hates uncertainty. And if we went ahead and restored it as a theater now, there’s two totally opposite type disasters that could result. The first is that nobody would come to it despite the sizeable investment. And of course then what do you do? And the second is that it would be too popular, attracting too many people to that area. I know that latter “disaster” might sound funny from a business standpoint, but you have to remember it IS located in a predominantly residential area. And that must be respected at all times. In fact, that’s why I was hoping the Mayfair Theatre farther down the Avenue could’ve become a movie theater again. For you must keep in mind that I’m far more of an artistic temperament than I am a businessman. Meaning that my number one concern is, is the moviegoing patron getting the best possible moviegoing experience? On the other hand, is Holmesburg ready for this and will it ever be? For it would be silly to force through what everyone is just going to say, “Huh, what?!” to. Which is why I’m holding back and letting the mall thing go through for now. Pizza anyone? And if that fails, then it might make it easier for me to step in and say, “Okay, let’s consider this theater idea again”…. For I’m ready to go forward with this thing when everyone else is. And right now we don’t know; that time might never even come. We don’t even know what the gambling’s going to do to this city yet. And even up here where no slots parlors are being proposed we have to think about that. A drag, isn’t it?

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on July 10, 2006 at 5:28 pm

In his books, the late Irvin Glazer characterizes this theater as “beautiful” and his description makes it clear it was an impressive Art Deco theater. He says it closed in 1951. Therefore, it didn’t survive TV? or was there also a migration of people from the area?
Its chances of again becoming a single screen theater are sllightly less good as TheaterBuff1’s chances of winning the multi-million dollar lottery. Slightly less good because the owner need not sell, or could be tied to lease obligations not to sell. And, he would need to get Hollywood studios to provide films, which they might not do.

When are they turning it into mini-mall?
Originally, “all of the ceilings and wall surfaces were painted in elaborate design…” I wander if any of that survived.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on June 26, 2006 at 7:43 am

Just to more thoroughly explain the very rough rendering I posted at the following link
Http://www.flickr.com/photos/TheaterBuff1/
those of you who are firsthand familiar with this building know that it faces directly (and abruptly) onto a very narrow sidewalk that is directly alongside what at times can be a heavily trafficked Northeast Philadelphia thoroughfare, Frankford Avenue. Thus it would be totally impractical, I feel, and would greatly undermine the movie-going experience, to restore it in such a way that would have it so the patrons must line up out along that narrow sidewalk while awaiting to buy tickets. Because of the theater’s close proximity to Frankford Avenue it’s an absolute must that they’ll be able to stand inside the theater’s sizeable lobby area — just as if it were a bank or classy hotel.

Now originally the theater was such that it was tightly wedged in between other buildings, hence why it was designed with no windows of any sort along the sides. Sizeable buildings once stood where its parking area to the left of it is now. But now that the left side of the theater is fully exposed, it really wouldn’t make sense to keep the left wall of the theater’s lobby portion windowless. Thus why I decided to introduce that large side window there. This way, those standing inside the lobby will be able to look out to see not only Frankford Avenue and other businesses directly across the avenue from it, but the adjacent parking area (where some of them will have their cars parked), plus a view of Frankford Avenue to the north of there, the historic Peale house which stands caticorner to the theater at Frankford and Welsh, and even a partial glimpse of Pennypack Park off in the distance, which the theater had been re-named after in the late 1940s. Inside the lobby area, meantime, the ticket counter will be just to the right of that side window so that patrons can enjoy that view as well as those out the front windows as they’re standing in line.

As for the parking lot itself, because it isn’t real large it will have to be for reserved/valet parking only. But keep in mind that the Holme/Pennypack Theatre is located in a very pedestrian-oriented area plus is within easy walking steps of several major public transit stops.

Regarding the beige-color facing you see along the side, this will be a type of stucco coating over the theater’s original brick facade, and will get spraypainted regularly to eliminate any blemish or graffiti that occurs. The theater will have no outdoor murals of any kind, but within there will be photo murals of Pennypack Park in the lobby portion and that will be changed regularly as the seasons change. Inside the theater’s auditorium meantime there will be hand-painted murals, again of Pennypack Park scenes, plus fancy plaster work around the theater’s proscenium and so on. And the curtains themselves will depict a large Pennypack Park scene. In fact, there’s going to be four sets of curtains with Pennypack Park scenes on each, each displaying a different season and to match whatever season it happens to be.

As for the theater’s marquis, it will be semi-rectangular in shape, and rather than having hand-placed letters, will display an L.E.D. print-out instead. And alongside the theater’s entrance to each side inside the outer vestibule area there will be wall-mounted movie poster display cases. But rather than their containing posters they will display L.E.D. printouts that will look like back-lit movie posters instead.

The plan is also to have it so no cellphones will ever be able to ring within the auditorium. As for the movies that will be shown there, since it’s to be a digital cinema, it will vary between first-run and classic films. And the seating style in the auditorium will not be stadium.

Other considerations, all its electricity needs will be provided by a combination of both roof-mounted solar panels and wind generators, its heating and cooling will be geothermal, and it will even rely on a roof-mounted rain-capturing system to acquire gray-water for its lavatories. And both the mens and ladies rooms will be manned by valets.

And at all times, admission cost will never exceed $5, and most times it will not even be that high. Add to this that there will never be any commercials shown in addition to film fare, plus concession stand prices will always be at an absolute minimum — the same as what you’d pay at any convenience store or supermarket. Maybe even less, if we can swing it.

But the big question is, IS Holmesburg ready for this yet? For that’s what’s really holding things up right now. For clearly the plan of this theater is not geared toward the tastes of the McConsumer set.

And yes, it absolutely will be single-screen.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on May 11, 2006 at 6:39 pm

Ah, HDTV267 strikes again with his “words of wisdom” I see! — and once again based on none other than shear ignorance, in this case his ignorance having to do with business itself. For he doesn’t understand that every store the restored Holme Theatre building is to contain is to be none other than but a mere replication of what that part of Northeast Philadelphia has plenty of already. Meaning that whatever new jobs it will create plus tax dollars for the city will be shortlived. The only exception is if it gets bail outs from the state to keep going, which is the case with many (if not most) of the businesses in Northeast Philadelphia’s Mayfair section, which is just to the southwest of the Holmesburg community where this historic theater building is located.

While it IS true that the area economy right around the Holme Theatre building could use more jobs, and the city of Philadelphia itself could use more tax dollars, the jobs that are needed here in the Holmesburg community are top-paying ones as opposed to those that entail stocking shelves with slave-labor produced goods from China, working behind an ice cream counter for penny wages and so on. For at this point in time that is NOT the direction that Holmesburg now needs to go in.

Meantime, my viewpoint right now is that I was just a little early when I came forth with my proposal to restore the Holme Theatre building back to being a classy neighborhood movie theater once more. Being as I’ve been away so ofttimes from Holmesburg in recent years leading up to when I first put forth my proposal last year, I didn’t know that Holmesburg still had some residue from the ignorant Frank Rizzo years still left in it. And going by HDTV267’s remarks above, I can see I’m still a bit early.

In any event, check out a very rough rendering I did of how I envision the future of the Holme Theatre building to look enroute to its being restored to a classy neghborhood movie theater once more. Along with photos I took of the Holme Theatre building last autumn, it can be seen at the following link:
Http://www.flickr.com/photos/TheaterBuff1/

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on March 15, 2006 at 8:51 pm

Another excellent William Harold Lee theater has just been discovered and can be found at this Cinema Treasures link: /theaters/7682/

Built in 1940, it looks similar in many ways to the Holme Theatre though it’s a lot smaller. And it’s being run very very well from the looks of it. Located in a small town just outside of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, one does really have to start to ask, if it can work there, why not here, too?

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on March 15, 2006 at 5:44 pm

Thanks for your vote of confidence, John! Meantime, just to go over some of the finer points, because of its location, it is positioned specifically to be a neighborhood theater, as it would be very tricky for a sizeable number of people to be able to get to it from outside the city or from other parts of the city. While Route 1 and I-95 can get people somewhat close to it, beyond that the stretch would be very slow moving, whether we’re talking Frankford Avenue, Welsh Road, Rhawn Street or any of the other major Northeast Philadelphia thoroughfares they’d then have to travel. And for those thoroughfares that would be quite an increase in traffic each time a movie is shown there! Which is why Mr. Haas’s suggestion (he being the man currently in charge of restoring the Boyd movie palace in Center City Philadelphia) that it might work if it were remade into a multiplex is totally out of the question. Which leads back to its being workable only if it could be made a neighborhood theater and those in the neighborhood could be counted on coming to it regularly.

And see, back when this theater was built, 1929, Holmesburg and other communities nearby were not so much the “Simon says” type communities they are now. I.e., at that time there was no such thing as a political machine, or any particular powerful religious faction, or any sorts of organized crime factions or whatever else, overshadowing Northeast Philadelphia the way it is now. Folks around here did as they wanted to do, not what some higher order told them it was okay, or not okay, to do. And the economy of Northeast Philadelphia at that time was such that people around here could do pretty much what they wished without fear. All told, it must have been fantastic!

Now, however, if I were to acquire this building to restore it as a theater but without this or that power-that-be’s blessing, if the powers-that-be tell the folks who reside around here not to go to this theater once it’s completely restored, simply put, they won’t. They’d all be afraid to.

In the Devon Theatre’s case farther down Frankford Avenue it’s a totally different story however. For there we see the political powers-that-be endorsing it. Of course, there’s going to be the big trade-off, all entertainment fare at the Devon limited to what they want the people around here to see and no more. I can assure you, for instance, nothing along the lines of “On the Waterfront” or “Erin Brockovitch” or “The Pawnbroker” or “The Molly Maguires” will ever get shown at the Devon…

JohnMessick
JohnMessick on March 15, 2006 at 1:53 am

I enjoy the saga and will stay tune.

JohnMessick
JohnMessick on March 15, 2006 at 1:53 am

I enjoy the saga and will stay tune.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on March 14, 2006 at 7:41 pm

Yes, but not for it to become a theater, at least not just yet. Far too many uncertainties still loom. Then again, everything looked rock solid and certain at the time it was built. That is, up until rock solid certainty itself struck, and the two — this theater and certainty itself — could not possibly have been more out of sync. William Harold Lee did design his theaters to be in solid alignment with the underlying natural environment though, something which never changes in terms of what it shall do and the predictability of which he understood very well — the mark of a very great architect. You can see in his design that he had actually been out to the site where it was built and more than likely oversaw all the surveying and geological studies himself, rather than designed it from some remote faraway office based upon none other than X amount of square feet to work with. He was a green architect long before that term was ever coined, stemming from his simplistic beginnings growing up in a small humble Pennsylvania farm town. And all throughout his career I don’t think he ever forgot it.

What I wish I could find, but have had no luck so far, is some Holmesburg resident, or former resident, who’s either still living or has their mind fully intact, who has sharp memories of what the Holme Theatre building was like when it was still a theater. My oldest brother got to see “Davy Crockett” there in 1956 or so — it likely being the last movie ever shown there and after it had been renamed the Pennypack — but he has no specific memories of it, being as neighborhood theaters were so plentiful at that time and he was so very young. And few if any thought of movie theaters as being “art forms” way back in those days. And here in 2006 many still don’t. But I think back in those days a lot of it had to do with film itself being seen as not all that permanent. But now that’s another thing that digital technology is in the process of revolutionizing, and which I believe in time will force us to see movie theaters as other than these fleeting things.

Anyhow, stay tuned to the Holme/Pennypack Theatre saga, as time could well prove to be its best days are still ahead of it…

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on March 7, 2006 at 6:35 pm

Just to put forth the latest info I can with regard to this historic theater building, first and foremost I had absolutely no idea when I first put forth the concept that it could be restored as a classy neighborhood movie theater the serious socio-economic issues the Holmesburg community all around it has. I was simply looking at the building itself plus the surrounding infrastructure, and based on that alone I began lining up various investors and theatrical equipment providers quite willing to get behind its restoration as a theater, and yes, to be a very classy one at that. Only to then come up against a wall of resistence to the proposal when I began talking it up with various Holmesburg residents. At first I held this against the residents of Holmesburg themselves, for it did seem quite unexplainable and unreasonable why anyone would not want such a classy theater so close to home. But then on further investigation I discovered that it was not they who were saying no to the proposal, but rather, certain individuals — nearly all if not all who are not from here — who have them very intimidated. In other words, a rot that currently exists in Holmesburg that clearly needs to be cleaned out first before a classy theater or anything else that’s nice can hope to rise up in Holmesburg. From my viewpoint, being that I’m fourth generation to here, Holmesburg has every right to be a beautiful community just as does any other community anywhere here in the U.S., while I really don’t have the time, patience or sympathy to debate this point with anyone who disagrees. And I just wish that my fellow Holmesburg residents could find the courage within themselves to say the same thing. Otherwise, how do we expect to rid Holmesburg of its rot once and for all? And I know, I know, drug dealers, bagmen, pimps, loan sharks, auto thieves, burglars, slumlords, cops who thought it was okay to turn crooked and whatever other human garbage have to be able to “earn” livings too. But when it comes at the expense of what otherwise could be a very beautiful Northeast Philadelphia community, I think all of us, not simply me, should seriously rethink that outlook. And to do it now while we still can.

For right now my backers are asking me what the big hold-up is, and I don’t know what else to tell them other than I’m as anxious to get on with this Holme/Pennypack Theatre restoration project as much as they are.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on January 17, 2006 at 4:59 pm

Correction:

Here’s the link for the Mayfair Theatre page:

/theaters/8257_0_2_0_C/

Sorry about that!

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on January 17, 2006 at 4:57 pm

The message I just posted at Cinema Treasure’s Mayfair Theatre page — /theaters/9141_0_2_0_C/ — contains principles that could be applied to this the Holme/Pennypack Theatre as well.

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on January 10, 2006 at 6:42 pm

At this link you can now see photos I took of this historic theater building as it looked in the autumn of 2005:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/theaterbuff1/

TheaterBuff1
TheaterBuff1 on January 9, 2006 at 6:30 pm

To hdtv267:

Thank you so kindly for posting those comments you did, as I’ve been trying to explain to educated outsiders how much Northeast Philly has gone downhill intellectually since its onetime heyday, and many thought perhaps I was just making it all up. And again I need to correct you, as it’s to be a Cold Stone CREAMERY, not “Cremery.” There’s no such word as “cremery”!!! And whether Cold Stone Creamery’s website makes mention of this being an upcoming site or not, I’m simply repeating what the Northeast Times article said with regards to what the future plans for that building are. So if the info I posted was incorrect, don’t complain to me about it, complain to the NE Times' Jeannie O'Sullivan, for she’s the one who wrote the article. Also if you’re in a complaining mood, you might want to complain to the Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance for refusing to budge with regard to acquiring for that Holme/Pennypack Theatre building the historic landmark status it deserves. This designation would insure that the Highland Development Group of Elkins Park doesn’t alter it too much in terms of its ever again being able to become a classy neighborhood movie theater.

When I look at that historic theater building and the sorry state that Daley’s Furniture & Appliance left it in when it vacated it, while others might just see it as a crappy old building, I see it like those thousand year old Bhuddist statues the Taliban destroyed leading up to 9/11, and with all of Northeast Philly right now in the grips of America’s Taliban as it were. To give credit where it’s due, Howard Stern is totally right when he says it’s weird that we’re fighting to crush the Taliban overseas while we have one right here in this country that keeps growing and growing yet is totally being ignored. And just as a reality check, you should re-read the comments you made, as they’re vary Taliban like.